Should telcos start looking at subsea power cables
As we noted a while back, the energy industry is becoming a lot like the telecoms industry.
From what was traditionally national grids, the energy sector is going increasingly cross border. The notion is not new since subsea power transmission cables have been in place to deliver energy from power rich markets to power starved countries, but new developments, such as the US government-led initiative to develop what could be an international smart grid, could now bring both telecoms and power transmission under the same umbrella.
This latest report says that the EU is now planning to provide 100 million euros of funding to build a second submarine power cable between Estonia and Finland.
The new system will have the capacity to transmit some 650 megawatts of power between the two markets. The project is an initiative of Fingrid and Elering, the two grid operators in the respective countries.
At this point, there seems to be no reference to any communications capabilities on the new cable. The big question is, of course, why not?
Not only will the ability to communicate between the grids make the power transmission more effective, since power loads can be balanced and power distribution optimised to where it is needed, but adding data transport to the cable would also facilitate the implementation of smarter grid infrastructure on either end.
The idea is not even new. Power companies have always leveraged their infrastructure to build their own communications networks. In fact, many a telecoms backbone provider – Korea’s Powercom being a prime example – was founded on the networks of the national utility.
There is no reason why the same situation can’t happen in the subsea space. Since much of the investment in subsea cables comes from the wet plant, it probably won’t costs the project developers much to add some fibre along side the power cable and start providing data connectivity between the countries.
Whether or not the two utilities would want build and operate their own telecoms cable is one big question. Whether the government would let them sell extra capacity on it as a telco is another. Whether or not there is demand for telecoms capacity between the two markets is obviously yet another variable.
But there doesn’t seem to be any reason why this model can’t be leverage by telcos themselves. For example, while multiple subsea telecoms cables are being built between Europe and the Middle East, a massive power cable infrastructure is now being proposed to connect Europe to the solar power potential of the Middle East.

An example of HVDC lines connecting Europe with MENA
Source: Hani El Nokraschy, Dr.-Ing. NOKRASCHY ENGINEERING GmbH
Similarly, an Australian organisation, DESERTEC-Australia, is proposing a massive energy transport infrastructure to link several Asian countries to Australia’s rich resources of clean energy. See below.

Energy corridor in Asia
Source: DESERTEC-Australia
All these proposed projects are along high traffic routes on the telecoms landscape. Why not put some fibre along them?
More From greentelecomlive
- Russia wants to provide power to Japan via subsea cable
- Subsea cables wanted for climate change research
- Broadband power line vs WiMAX for smart grids
greentelecomlive Recommends
- Additional Information on Stock Correlations (Deep Market)
- Quick Glance at Head and Shoulders Pattern Statistics (Deep Market)
Related posts:
- Massive subsea cable outage in Asia highlights need to balance efficiency with reliability
- Green Telecom special report: Start up, VNL, introduces re-engineered, low power GSM system
- Where do telcos fit into the smart grid game
- Alvarion in smart meter pilots – where are the telcos?
- Only three telcos make Global 100 “Green” list
Category: Climate change, Featured articles, Networks, Smart grids







