<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Telecoms has US$1.2 trillion carbon abatement potential – report</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.greentelecomlive.com/2008/07/23/telecoms-has-us12-trillion-carbon-abatement-potential-%e2%80%93-report/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.greentelecomlive.com/2008/07/23/telecoms-has-us12-trillion-carbon-abatement-potential-%e2%80%93-report/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=telecoms-has-us12-trillion-carbon-abatement-potential-%25e2%2580%2593-report</link>
	<description>sustainable telecoms news and analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 00:30:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: CSR Perspective</title>
		<link>http://www.greentelecomlive.com/2008/07/23/telecoms-has-us12-trillion-carbon-abatement-potential-%e2%80%93-report/comment-page-1/#comment-149640</link>
		<dc:creator>CSR Perspective</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 19:24:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greentelecomlive.com/2008/07/23/telecoms-has-us12-trillion-carbon-abatement-potential-%e2%80%93-report/#comment-149640</guid>
		<description>[...] Green: Telecommunications Value in Promoting Environmental Improvement, 2008-2013,” on his blog. The report notes that the telecommunications industry has the potential to abate as much as US$1.2 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Green: Telecommunications Value in Promoting Environmental Improvement, 2008-2013,” on his blog. The report notes that the telecommunications industry has the potential to abate as much as US$1.2 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Ng</title>
		<link>http://www.greentelecomlive.com/2008/07/23/telecoms-has-us12-trillion-carbon-abatement-potential-%e2%80%93-report/comment-page-1/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Ng</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 16:13:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greentelecomlive.com/2008/07/23/telecoms-has-us12-trillion-carbon-abatement-potential-%e2%80%93-report/#comment-31</guid>
		<description>Hi Tony, I read your article with great interest. I would recommend that you also research the topic on &quot;Floating Car Data&quot; using cellular networks. With today&#039;s cellular network, we are already able to collect mobile phones location positioning in the course of its normal RF network connections activities. By collecting a group of mobile positions along the street - floating data - you can use the data to measure movement on any roadways and provide accurate speed measurements. This results in a real-time traffic congestion information as updated as every 1 minute. This information is then turned into consumer services delivered to the mobile, or into business to business services. You should visit www.intellione.com for one example of such solution. The solution provides immediate impact to the environment as it encourages consumer to plan ahead on trips, and reduces gas emission on roads by avoiding congestions. There is now great demand for ITIS companies, Navigations, Mapping companies to draw in this kind of data. The value here is that is real-time and in the hands of consumer, so the translation of positive environment impact will be immediate and direct.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Tony, I read your article with great interest. I would recommend that you also research the topic on &#8220;Floating Car Data&#8221; using cellular networks. With today&#8217;s cellular network, we are already able to collect mobile phones location positioning in the course of its normal RF network connections activities. By collecting a group of mobile positions along the street &#8211; floating data &#8211; you can use the data to measure movement on any roadways and provide accurate speed measurements. This results in a real-time traffic congestion information as updated as every 1 minute. This information is then turned into consumer services delivered to the mobile, or into business to business services. You should visit <a href="http://www.intellione.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.intellione.com</a> for one example of such solution. The solution provides immediate impact to the environment as it encourages consumer to plan ahead on trips, and reduces gas emission on roads by avoiding congestions. There is now great demand for ITIS companies, Navigations, Mapping companies to draw in this kind of data. The value here is that is real-time and in the hands of consumer, so the translation of positive environment impact will be immediate and direct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Chan</title>
		<link>http://www.greentelecomlive.com/2008/07/23/telecoms-has-us12-trillion-carbon-abatement-potential-%e2%80%93-report/comment-page-1/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Chan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 18:36:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greentelecomlive.com/2008/07/23/telecoms-has-us12-trillion-carbon-abatement-potential-%e2%80%93-report/#comment-30</guid>
		<description>Hi Bill, thanks for the info. The concept sounds very interesting.

Look for a proper post on the main page in the next couple of days when I&#039;ve had some time to digest the info..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Bill, thanks for the info. The concept sounds very interesting.</p>
<p>Look for a proper post on the main page in the next couple of days when I&#8217;ve had some time to digest the info..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill St. Arnaud</title>
		<link>http://www.greentelecomlive.com/2008/07/23/telecoms-has-us12-trillion-carbon-abatement-potential-%e2%80%93-report/comment-page-1/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill St. Arnaud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 14:56:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greentelecomlive.com/2008/07/23/telecoms-has-us12-trillion-carbon-abatement-potential-%e2%80%93-report/#comment-29</guid>
		<description>You may be interested in a project in Ottawa to encourage carbon reduction by providing free triple play and fiber to the home

http://free-fiber-to-the-home.blogspot.com/

Bill</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may be interested in a project in Ottawa to encourage carbon reduction by providing free triple play and fiber to the home</p>
<p><a href="http://free-fiber-to-the-home.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://free-fiber-to-the-home.blogspot.com/</a></p>
<p>Bill</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Comment from Insight Research&#8217;s Daniel G Bauer on carbon abatement potential of telecoms sector :</title>
		<link>http://www.greentelecomlive.com/2008/07/23/telecoms-has-us12-trillion-carbon-abatement-potential-%e2%80%93-report/comment-page-1/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>Comment from Insight Research&#8217;s Daniel G Bauer on carbon abatement potential of telecoms sector :</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 04:12:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greentelecomlive.com/2008/07/23/telecoms-has-us12-trillion-carbon-abatement-potential-%e2%80%93-report/#comment-28</guid>
		<description>[...] the Insight Research report on telecom&#8217;s carbon abatement potential, commented on my earlier coverage on the report. The information is so good that I&#8217;ve decided to put it the main [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the Insight Research report on telecom&#8217;s carbon abatement potential, commented on my earlier coverage on the report. The information is so good that I&#8217;ve decided to put it the main [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel G. Bauer</title>
		<link>http://www.greentelecomlive.com/2008/07/23/telecoms-has-us12-trillion-carbon-abatement-potential-%e2%80%93-report/comment-page-1/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel G. Bauer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 20:50:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greentelecomlive.com/2008/07/23/telecoms-has-us12-trillion-carbon-abatement-potential-%e2%80%93-report/#comment-27</guid>
		<description>As the author of the GREEN Communications report, and on behalf of Insight Research Corporation, I want to thank Mr. Chan for pinpointing the main thrust that led to this 17-month long undertaking. That thrust, is that service providers, generally, and carriers, specifically, may enjoy a substantial window of opportunity to capture market share and realize an overall cumulative adjusted growth rate forecast of 35% over the next 5-year period. As is true with all windows of opportunity, they close. Leading to our US$1.2 trillion impact figure, we incorporate over 60,000 variables into the worldwide GREEN Communications Model. We identified 55+ offers that carriers/service providers can provide to end-user market segments including consumers, small office home office, small medium sized businesses, real estate management companies, and enterprise customers. Furthermore, we tracked and forecasted the value of carbon credits (1 metric ton of carbon dioxide = 1 carbon credit). Now the real issue will be if carriers/service providers don&#039;t implement and incorporate GREEN Communications into their market offerings, electric power and other utility holding companies will. A climate change strategy not only provides accrued benefits pertaining to Corporate Social Responsibility (maximizes shareholder, stakeholder, and community value) but the main impetus for Insight Research&#039;s GREEN Communications report readers is that a product sales and marketing roadmap is provided. This approach provides the impetus for decisions starting at the chief executive officer level and supported and promoted by the other c-level executives for the implementation of both an internal and an external climate change strategy. It begs the question and provides the answer all at the same time. Carriers can save money (OPEX reduction) by going GREEN. Carriers can maximize shareholder value. Carriers can increase revenues, market share, improve margins, and enhance and differentiate their brand. The GREEN Communications report is even further segmented down to geographic areas and country economic status. Not many industry sectors possess the reach that carriers do, whether they be in Indonesia, Brazil, United States, UAE, or Spain, Ghana, and Australia. This is BIG. This is REAL.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the author of the GREEN Communications report, and on behalf of Insight Research Corporation, I want to thank Mr. Chan for pinpointing the main thrust that led to this 17-month long undertaking. That thrust, is that service providers, generally, and carriers, specifically, may enjoy a substantial window of opportunity to capture market share and realize an overall cumulative adjusted growth rate forecast of 35% over the next 5-year period. As is true with all windows of opportunity, they close. Leading to our US$1.2 trillion impact figure, we incorporate over 60,000 variables into the worldwide GREEN Communications Model. We identified 55+ offers that carriers/service providers can provide to end-user market segments including consumers, small office home office, small medium sized businesses, real estate management companies, and enterprise customers. Furthermore, we tracked and forecasted the value of carbon credits (1 metric ton of carbon dioxide = 1 carbon credit). Now the real issue will be if carriers/service providers don&#8217;t implement and incorporate GREEN Communications into their market offerings, electric power and other utility holding companies will. A climate change strategy not only provides accrued benefits pertaining to Corporate Social Responsibility (maximizes shareholder, stakeholder, and community value) but the main impetus for Insight Research&#8217;s GREEN Communications report readers is that a product sales and marketing roadmap is provided. This approach provides the impetus for decisions starting at the chief executive officer level and supported and promoted by the other c-level executives for the implementation of both an internal and an external climate change strategy. It begs the question and provides the answer all at the same time. Carriers can save money (OPEX reduction) by going GREEN. Carriers can maximize shareholder value. Carriers can increase revenues, market share, improve margins, and enhance and differentiate their brand. The GREEN Communications report is even further segmented down to geographic areas and country economic status. Not many industry sectors possess the reach that carriers do, whether they be in Indonesia, Brazil, United States, UAE, or Spain, Ghana, and Australia. This is BIG. This is REAL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Chan</title>
		<link>http://www.greentelecomlive.com/2008/07/23/telecoms-has-us12-trillion-carbon-abatement-potential-%e2%80%93-report/comment-page-1/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Chan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 21:18:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greentelecomlive.com/2008/07/23/telecoms-has-us12-trillion-carbon-abatement-potential-%e2%80%93-report/#comment-26</guid>
		<description>Hi Kevin, I have been following BT&#039;s environmental performance since I started this site back at the end of 2007 - in fact, one of the first interviews for the site was with BT&#039;s Donna Young, who basically give me a climate change 101 lesson to help me get up to speed on the topic - very much appreciated on my part.

I think BT is probably one of the leaders in understanding the business requirements of operating in the new carbon-awared economy and is well on its way to putting the necessary systems (both technical and operational) in place to achieve results.

The biggest problem is that there are still (many) carriers out there who have no idea of the issues of climate change, who have not gone through what I loosely define as the six stages of implementing a successful climate change strategy - audit (seeing what their environmental footprint is), analyze (looking at their carbon intensity), identify (find where they can improve), deploy (implement solutions), monitor (check results of those solutions) and maintain (put in place long term improvement goals).

I believe part of the problem is regulatory, especially here in Asia where customers are less concern on CSR than perhaps more discerning end-users in the US and Europe. The carriers that have progress the most in terms of strategies and initiatives to achieve sustainability all come from markets where the governments have implemented strong directives to reduce overall emissions, i.e. Japan, and most recently Australia, and to some extent China (albeit lacking in a systematic approach and implementation details).

Part of the problem is simply old business practices and lack of senior executive buy-in. It will take some bold decisions by CEOs to launch a business case for implementing climate change policies because carriers today are asked to do so much more with so much less - in terms of financing as well as human resources. So I doubt any middle manager will have the time to put together, nevermind, take the responsibility for, a new business case for a sustainability project.

It&#039;s going to take a full fledge effort, with dedicated human resources, and probably extra workload across all department (in terms of implementation of project initiatives, reporting and so on) to make a company fully carbon-awared - that perhaps is the biggest climate change challenge for today&#039;s carriers, and to a greater extent, the rest of the corporate world.

Then again, don&#039;t they know they can save money by going green?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Kevin, I have been following BT&#8217;s environmental performance since I started this site back at the end of 2007 &#8211; in fact, one of the first interviews for the site was with BT&#8217;s Donna Young, who basically give me a climate change 101 lesson to help me get up to speed on the topic &#8211; very much appreciated on my part.</p>
<p>I think BT is probably one of the leaders in understanding the business requirements of operating in the new carbon-awared economy and is well on its way to putting the necessary systems (both technical and operational) in place to achieve results.</p>
<p>The biggest problem is that there are still (many) carriers out there who have no idea of the issues of climate change, who have not gone through what I loosely define as the six stages of implementing a successful climate change strategy &#8211; audit (seeing what their environmental footprint is), analyze (looking at their carbon intensity), identify (find where they can improve), deploy (implement solutions), monitor (check results of those solutions) and maintain (put in place long term improvement goals).</p>
<p>I believe part of the problem is regulatory, especially here in Asia where customers are less concern on CSR than perhaps more discerning end-users in the US and Europe. The carriers that have progress the most in terms of strategies and initiatives to achieve sustainability all come from markets where the governments have implemented strong directives to reduce overall emissions, i.e. Japan, and most recently Australia, and to some extent China (albeit lacking in a systematic approach and implementation details).</p>
<p>Part of the problem is simply old business practices and lack of senior executive buy-in. It will take some bold decisions by CEOs to launch a business case for implementing climate change policies because carriers today are asked to do so much more with so much less &#8211; in terms of financing as well as human resources. So I doubt any middle manager will have the time to put together, nevermind, take the responsibility for, a new business case for a sustainability project.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s going to take a full fledge effort, with dedicated human resources, and probably extra workload across all department (in terms of implementation of project initiatives, reporting and so on) to make a company fully carbon-awared &#8211; that perhaps is the biggest climate change challenge for today&#8217;s carriers, and to a greater extent, the rest of the corporate world.</p>
<p>Then again, don&#8217;t they know they can save money by going green?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Moss</title>
		<link>http://www.greentelecomlive.com/2008/07/23/telecoms-has-us12-trillion-carbon-abatement-potential-%e2%80%93-report/comment-page-1/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Moss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 19:16:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greentelecomlive.com/2008/07/23/telecoms-has-us12-trillion-carbon-abatement-potential-%e2%80%93-report/#comment-25</guid>
		<description>This is a great list of activities but we are all from big companies and big companies can do lots of things and things with big numbers attached – but how do we know if they are sufficient ?   The challenge that we should be setting ourselves as corporations is to be able to put our activities and targets within the context of solving the problem. So for example if every company followed HP’s great example and took back that much waste (as a proportion of the material they produce) would we have  a sustainable approach to landfills ?
BT has tried to do this with our new Climate Stabilization Intensity (CSI) target for emissions reduction by setting a target for reductions that, if all corporations were to set similar targets, would put us on the road that reflects the most recent scientific consensus for what is required to achieve stabilization.   http://www.btplc.com/News/Articles/ShowArticle.cfm?ArticleID=f1df4b4f-ca46-4dee-849a-66e447b53e68</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great list of activities but we are all from big companies and big companies can do lots of things and things with big numbers attached – but how do we know if they are sufficient ?   The challenge that we should be setting ourselves as corporations is to be able to put our activities and targets within the context of solving the problem. So for example if every company followed HP’s great example and took back that much waste (as a proportion of the material they produce) would we have  a sustainable approach to landfills ?<br />
BT has tried to do this with our new Climate Stabilization Intensity (CSI) target for emissions reduction by setting a target for reductions that, if all corporations were to set similar targets, would put us on the road that reflects the most recent scientific consensus for what is required to achieve stabilization.   <a href="http://www.btplc.com/News/Articles/ShowArticle.cfm?ArticleID=f1df4b4f-ca46-4dee-849a-66e447b53e68" rel="nofollow">http://www.btplc.com/News/Articles/ShowArticle.cfm?ArticleID=f1df4b4f-ca46-4dee-849a-66e447b53e68</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

